Border rescue

Kieran Oberman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

Every year, thousands of refugees and other migrants die trying to cross borders. The dangers are many. Migrants die from exhaustion crossing deserts, freeze on mountain passes, drown at sea. One way states can save lives is by undertaking rescue operations. This chapter asks whether receiving states have any special duty to do so. The idea of a ‘special duty’ here can be brought out with the following question: Do receiving states owe a duty to rescue migrants at borders that they do not owe all people in need? In answering this question, the chapter starts with an important yet easily overly looked point: crossing borders is not inherently dangerous. Migrants die crossing borders because receiving states restrict migration. This fact, in itself, does not mean that receiving states have a special duty to rescue, but it does mean they cannot claim that border deaths are nothing to do with them. The question we need to ask is whether receiving states bear moral responsibility for border deaths as well as causal responsibility. The chapter goes in search of, and finds, arguments for why receiving states are morally responsible. States cannot treat border deaths like any other misfortune without changing their immigration policies.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Political Philosophy of Refuge
EditorsDavid Miller, Christine Straehle
PublisherCambrige University Press
Chapter4
Pages78-96
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9781108666466
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Keywords

  • refugees
  • migrants
  • immigration
  • ethics of immigration
  • duty to rescue
  • search and rescue
  • moral responsibility
  • James Pattison
  • Alexander Betts
  • Paul Collier

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Border rescue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this