Abstract
Since the findings of a Fatal Accident Inquiry (FAI) in 2010, clinicians working in Scotland have been advised to discuss the risk of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) with patients immediately or soon after a diagnosis of epilepsy is made. A thematic analysis was used to describe the experiences discussing SUDEP of 10 clinicians (six Consultant Neurologists and four Neurology Registrars) working in Scotland. Contrary to previous research, clinicians appear to be routinely discussing SUDEP in a standardized fashion with newly diagnosed patients and the FAI appears to have instigated this change in practice. Clinicians are ambivalent about the practice and whether this is a Breaking Bad News (BBN) experience. Clinicians appear to anticipate that patients will be anxious or distressed discussing SUDEP, despite their experiences that patients do not react this way. There are further concerns that the pressure to discuss SUDEP, as a result of the FAI, hinders effective communication of the SUDEP message. Implications for guideline development are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 72-79 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Epilepsy and Behavior |
Volume | 70 |
Early online date | 12 Apr 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2017 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- Breaking Bad News
- epilepsy
- neurology practice
- qualitative
- SUDEP
- thematic analysis