TY - JOUR
T1 - Building the weak hand of the state
T2 - Tracing the market boundaries of high pharmaceutical prices in France
AU - Bourgeron, Théo
AU - Geiger, Susi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by H2020 European Research Council: [Grant Number 771217].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022/10/1
Y1 - 2022/10/1
N2 - Prices for new medications have strongly increased over the last decades, reaching levels that could endanger healthcare insurance systems. Focusing on the French case, this article builds on the structural approach of business power and investigates how this situation results from the construction of market boundaries that created unassailable spaces for high pricing. Starting from the 1990s, it traces how high drug prices relied on the construction of a market setting first designed to increase pharmaceutical prices, in which the negotiating position of the state was deliberately weakened. But the politics of maintaining such high drug pricing quickly required reshaping the boundaries of the pharmaceutical market and concentrating the favourable negotiation framework on a small number of innovative medicines. Most recently, the spiralling of prices for these medicines have necessitated yet another revisiting of these market boundaries. High drug prices do not result from direct business power by the pharmaceutical sector; rather, the pharmaceutical sector depends on boundary-work performed in cooperation with state institutions to carve out domains for favourable market pricing. Emphasising the politics of this boundary-work thus ultimately also signals its potential reversibility.
AB - Prices for new medications have strongly increased over the last decades, reaching levels that could endanger healthcare insurance systems. Focusing on the French case, this article builds on the structural approach of business power and investigates how this situation results from the construction of market boundaries that created unassailable spaces for high pricing. Starting from the 1990s, it traces how high drug prices relied on the construction of a market setting first designed to increase pharmaceutical prices, in which the negotiating position of the state was deliberately weakened. But the politics of maintaining such high drug pricing quickly required reshaping the boundaries of the pharmaceutical market and concentrating the favourable negotiation framework on a small number of innovative medicines. Most recently, the spiralling of prices for these medicines have necessitated yet another revisiting of these market boundaries. High drug prices do not result from direct business power by the pharmaceutical sector; rather, the pharmaceutical sector depends on boundary-work performed in cooperation with state institutions to carve out domains for favourable market pricing. Emphasising the politics of this boundary-work thus ultimately also signals its potential reversibility.
KW - access to medicines
KW - market boundaries
KW - pharmaceutical drug prices
KW - price negotiation
KW - structural power
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125139106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/cnpe20
U2 - 10.1080/13563467.2022.2036115
DO - 10.1080/13563467.2022.2036115
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125139106
SN - 1356-3467
VL - 27
SP - 837
EP - 850
JO - New Political Economy
JF - New Political Economy
IS - 5
ER -