‘But It’s Just a Fish’: Understanding the challenges of applying the 3Rs in laboratory aquariums in the UK

Reuben Message*, Beth Greenhough

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Adopting a social science perspective and qualitative methodology on the problem of laboratory fish welfare, this paper examines some underlying social factors and drivers that influence thinking, priorities and implementation of fish welfare initiatives and the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) for fish. Drawing on original qualitative interviews with stakeholders, animal technologists and scientists who work with fish—especially zebrafish—to illustrate the case, this paper explores some key social factors influencing the take up of the 3Rs in this context. Our findings suggest the relevance of factors including ambient cultural perceptions of fish, disagreements about the evidence on fish pain and suffering, the discourse of regulators, and the experiences of scientists and animal technologists who develop and put the 3Rs into practice. The discussion is focused on the UK context, although the main themes will be pertinent around the world.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1075
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalAnimals
Volume9
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Dec 2019

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • 3Rs
  • social science
  • qualitative analyses
  • fish
  • zebrafish
  • society-animal relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘But It’s Just a Fish’: Understanding the challenges of applying the 3Rs in laboratory aquariums in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this