Can referendums foster citizen deliberation? The experience of Canada and the United Kingdom

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Both Canada and the United Kingdom have used referendums, albeit sparingly, to resolve constitutional issues, including proposals for the independence of Quebec (1980 and 1995) and Scotland (2014). The procedure was different in each case. In Scotland, the legality and procedure for the referendum was agreed by both the UK and Scottish governments and the question evaluated by an independent body and then accepted by both sides. Both sides promised to respect the result. This was not the case in Quebec. In the UK the principle that a simple majority was sufficient was accepted, which it was not in the Quebec case, partly because Quebec contains national minorities. In both cases, the question put was whether or not to accept the proposition (independence in Scotland and ‘sovereignty’ in Quebec), when opinion polls showed strong support for an intermediate position. The advantage of the Scottish option, of an agreed question, is that attention during the campaign was focused on the merits of the issue, rather than the meaning of the question.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationConstitutional Politics and the Territorial Question in Canada and the United Kingdom
Subtitle of host publicationFederalism and Devolution Compared
EditorsMichael Keating, Guy Laforest
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages159-177
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9783319580746
ISBN (Print)9783319580739
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameComparative Territorial Politics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Can referendums foster citizen deliberation? The experience of Canada and the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this