Capacity or necessity? Comparing the socio-economic distribution of productive activities between Italy and South Korea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Much productive ageing research aims to identify the conditions under which older adults engage in productive roles within and outside the family. This study conceptualises two individual-level explanations for productive participation: capacity and necessity. I hypothesise that whether capacity or necessity prevails across different socio-economic groups depends on the degree of social protection guaranteed by pensions and long-term care systems, which varies across countries. Drawing on data from the SHARE and KLoSA surveys, this study compares socio-economic gradients in full-time work and informal caregiving across cohorts of men and women aged 50–75 in Italy and South Korea in 2006/07 and 2014/15. In Italy, where later-life social protection is generous, productive engagement is more common among wealthier and higher-educated individuals, who have greater capacity to engage in productive roles. In Korea, where social protection is limited, working is more common among socio-economically disadvantaged women, who have higher necessity to remain economically productive.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-34
Number of pages14
JournalResearch on Aging
Volume45
Issue number1
Early online date23 Apr 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2023

Keywords

  • employment
  • inequality
  • international comparative study
  • long-term care
  • socio-economic status

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Capacity or necessity? Comparing the socio-economic distribution of productive activities between Italy and South Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this