Abstract
We propose a theory of the economic advantage (EA) of regulating carbon emissions by linking two emissions trading systems versus operating them under autarky. Linking implies that permits issued in one system can be traded internationally for use in the other. We show how the nature of uncertainty, market sizes, and sunk costs of linking determine EA. Even when sunk costs are small so
EA>0
EA>0
, autarky can be preferable to one partner, depending on jurisdiction characteristics. Moreover, one partner’s permit price volatility under linking may increase without making linking the less preferred option. An empirical application calibrates jurisdiction characteristics to demonstrate the economic significance of our results, which can make linking partner match crucial for the effectiveness and success of the Paris Agreement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 701-730 |
Journal | Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 2 Jun 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Sept 2017 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- climate change policy
- emission trading
- linking
- market-based regulation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Carbon dating: When is it beneficial to link ETSs?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Luca Taschini
- Business School - Chair in Climate Change Finance
- Accounting and Finance
- Centre for Business, Climate Change and Sustainability
- Climate Change and Sustainability
- Edinburgh Centre for Financial Innovations
Person: Academic: Research Active