Cardiac Troponin T and Troponin I in the General Population: Comparing and Contrasting Their Genetic Determinants and Associations With Outcomes

Paul Welsh, David Preiss, Caroline Hayward, Anoop S.V. Shah, David McAllister, Andrew Briggs, Charles Boachie, Alex McConnachie, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Claire Welsh, Mark Woodward, Archie Campbell, David Porteous, Nicholas L. Mills, Naveed Sattar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is great interest in widening the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponins for population cardiovascular disease (CVD) and heart failure screening. However, it is not clear whether cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and troponin I (cTnI) are equivalent measures of risk in this setting. We aimed to compare and contrast (1) the association of cTnT and cTnI with CVD and non-CVD outcomes, and (2) their determinants in a genome-wide association study.

METHODS: High-sensitivity cTnT and cTnI were measured in serum from 19 501 individuals in Generation Scotland Scottish Family Health Study. Median follow-up was 7.8 years (quartile 1 to quartile 3, 7.1–9.2). Associations of each troponin with a composite CVD outcome (1177 events), CVD death (n=266), non-CVD death (n=374), and heart failure (n=216) were determined by using Cox models. A genome-wide association study was conducted using a standard approach developed for the cohort.

RESULTS: Both cTnI and cTnT were strongly associated with CVD risk in unadjusted models. After adjusting for classical risk factors, the hazard ratio for a 1 SD increase in log transformed troponin was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.17–1.32) and 1.11 (1.04–1.19) for cTnI and cTnT, respectively; ratio of hazard ratios 1.12 (1.04–1.21). cTnI, but not cTnT, was associated with myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease. Both cTnI and cTnT had strong associations with CVD death and heart failure. By contrast, cTnT, but not cTnI, was associated with non-CVD death; ratio of hazard ratios 0.77 (0.67–0.88). We identified 5 loci (53 individual single-nucleotide polymorphisms) that had genome-wide significant associations with cTnI, and a different set of 4 loci (4 single-nucleotide polymorphisms) for cTnT.

CONCLUSIONS: The upstream genetic causes of low-grade elevations in cTnI and cTnT appear distinct, and their associations with outcomes also differ. Elevations in cTnI are more strongly associated with some CVD outcomes, whereas cTnT is more strongly associated with the risk of non-CVD death. These findings help inform the selection of an optimal troponin assay for future clinical care and research in this setting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2754–2764
JournalCirculation
Volume139
Issue number24
Early online date24 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cardiac Troponin T and Troponin I in the General Population: Comparing and Contrasting Their Genetic Determinants and Associations With Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this