Cardiovascular Testing in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Volume Recovery and Worldwide Comparison

Cole B. Hirschfeld, Sharmila Dorbala , Leslee J. Shaw, Todd C. Villines, Andrew D. Choi, Nathan Better , Rodrigo J. Cerci, Ganesan Karthikeyan, João V. Vitola , Michelle C Williams, Mouaz Al-mallah, Daniel S. Berman, Adam Bernheim, Robert W. Biederman, Paco E. Bravo, Matthew J. Budoff, Renée P. Bullock-Palmer, Marcus Y. Chen, Michael P. Dilorenzo, Rami DoukkyMaros Ferencik, Jeffrey B. Geske, Fadi G. Hage, Robert C. Hendel, Lynne Koweek, Venkatesh L. Murthy, Jagat Narula, Patricia F. Rodriguez Lozano, Nishant R. Shah, Amee Shah, Prem Soman, Randall C. Thompson, David Wolinsky, Yosef A. Cohen, Eli Malkovskiy, Michael J. Randazzo, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Purvi Parwani, Mrinali Shetty, Thomas N. B. Pascual, Yaroslav Pynda , Maurizio Dondi, Diana Paez , Andrew J. Einstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Background: Disruptions in healthcare early in the COVID-19 pandemic led to a marked decline in diagnostic cardiovascular testing. This study aims to characterize subsequent recovery of procedure volumes in US and non-US facilities in the year following the initial outbreak.

Methods: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) coordinated a worldwide survey, collecting data from 669 facilities in 107 countries (including 93 facilities in 34 US states) to determine the pandemic’s impact on diagnostic cardiovascular procedure volumes. Participants reported volumes for each diagnostic modality utilized at their facility for March 2019 (baseline), April 2020, and April 2021. We evaluated changes in procedure volume between US and non-US facilities and between US regions, and analyzed factors associated with return of procedure volume to pre-pandemic baseline in the US.

Results: Reduction in procedure volumes in April 2020 was similar for US and non-US facilities (-66% vs. -71%, p=0.27). US facilities reported greater return to baseline in April 2021 than all non-US facilities (4% vs. -6% p=0.01), but there was no difference when comparing US facilities to non-US high-income country (NUHIC) facilities (4% vs. 0%, p=0.18). Regional differences in return to baseline were observed between the Midwest (11%), Northeast (9%), South (1%), and West (-7%, p=0.03). No studied factors were significant predictors of 2021 change from pre-pandemic baseline in a multivariable regression analysis.

Conclusions:
The marked reductions in cardiac testing during the early pandemic have recovered within a year to pre-pandemic baselines in the US and NUHIC, while procedure volumes remain depressed in lower-income countries.
Original languageEnglish
JournalRadiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging
Early online date21 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2023

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • COVID-19
  • cardiovascular imaging
  • diagnostic cardiovascular procedure
  • cardiovascular disease
  • cardiac testing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cardiovascular Testing in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Volume Recovery and Worldwide Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this