Care to trust? Gender and trust in leaders during the Coronavirus pandemic

Hannah Willis*, Jessica C. Smith, Daniel Devine

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

There has been praise of how female leaders have handled the Coronavirus pandemic relative to their male counterparts by presenting a more “caring” leadership. Of similar coverage has been the role of public trust for how successful governments have been in containing outbreaks. In this paper, we build on these two literatures to understand different determinants of trust during the pandemic between men and women. Following social role theory, we argue that female citizens’ trust judgements are more likely to be driven by the perception that leaders are more caring than are men, whilst men's judgements are more likely to be driven by competence judgements than women's. We test this argument using original survey data from three countries. We find that this relationship holds in the United States, but not the United Kingdom or Italy. This adds to variation in gender gaps in the USA and Europe; at the same time, it also suggests that the propensity for women to be less trusting than men is not down to (perceived) leadership traits.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)232-244
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date15 Jun 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Care to trust? Gender and trust in leaders during the Coronavirus pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this