Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Abstract

Understanding the effect of certain factors or interventions is the objective of many researchers and decision-makers. However, when using quantitative analyses for this purpose, it is virtually impossible to include all relevant data, which often leads to biased coefficients that only indicate correlation rather than effect. To help overcome this limitation, we introduce relatively simple formulas (closed-form solutions) to estimate direct relationships between variables in the presence of unobserved factors (confounders) that simultaneously affect the two variables of interest. The estimated coefficient can be interpreted as causal when it is possible to rule out bidirectional relationships. Simulations show that our estimates match the unbiased coefficients up to 15 decimal places when the controls are independent of the omitted variables, significantly outperforming the respective Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimates in all scenarios considered. We also find that, even with moderate correlation between the controls and the unobserved variables (up to 0.40), our method leads to estimates closer to the actual causal coefficients as compared to the OLS estimates in more than 70% of the cases. A real-world dataset is used to illustrate the application of the method in the field of management.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70062
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Early online date26 Mar 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Mar 2026

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • causal inference
  • unobserved confounding
  • omitted variable bias
  • non-experimental data

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Causal inference without complete information: A closed-form solution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this