Abstract
Anonymity is treated as a problem of governance that can be subject to technical resolution. We use the example of the darknet to critically examine this approach. We explore the background assumptions that have been made about anonymity as a quality of social life. We conceive of anonymity as a way of engaging and maintaining social relationships in an anonymous mode. We draw on a study of darknet ‘cryptomarket’ users who mainly use the darknet to buy and sell illicit drugs, discuss drug quality and share information on safe and effective use. We identify the personal satisfaction that comes from interacting anonymously online, the challenges this represents for maintaining trusted interactions and how they are overcome, and the combination of technology and action involved in maintaining anonymity. We argue that attempts to promote de-anonymising norms and technology are based on an erroneous understanding of what anonymity is.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 497-512 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Information, Communication and Society |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 20 May 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Apr 2017 |
Keywords
- darknet
- drugs
- digital sociology
- anonymity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Challenging the techno-politics of anonymity: the case of cryptomarket users'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Angus Bancroft
- School of Social and Political Science - Personal Chair of Sociology
Person: Academic: Research Active