Abstract
Our response to the Great British Medallist (GBM) study focuses on three concerns. First, we discuss the extent to which the findings presented are actually novel and offer practitioners genuine guidance and information about how to structure talent development pathways. Second, we suggest that a lack of critical consideration of the findings against the considerable body of knowledge that already exists in this domain is a significant limitation. Finally, and most pertinently from a practitioner perspective, we highlight our concerns about the extent to which the findings presented may be prematurely adopted by practitioners without a genuinely appropriate evidence base.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Progress in Brain Research |
Editors | Vincent Walsh, Mark Wilson, Beth Parkin |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Pages | 149-154 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Volume | 232 |
ISBN (Print) | 0079-6123 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Feb 2017 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- Evidence base
- Talent development
- Pracademic
- Criticality
- Challenge
- Psychobehavioral skills