ChatGPT’s interpretation of contested memoryscapes favours the voice of current governments, capitalism and the far-right

Tania González Cantera*, Chiara Bonacchi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examines political biases in ChatGPT-4o’s interpretations of memoryscapes linked to dictatorial regimes in Spanish-speaking countries. Using a least-to-most prompting model and a Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA), we analysed responses in both Spanish and English about three key memorial sites: the Valley of the Fallen (Spain), the ESMA Museum and Site of Memory (Argentina), and the Monument to Salvador Allende (Chile). Findings show a preference for dominant, capitalist, and government-aligned perspectives, often reinforced by far-right rhetoric, particularly in Spanish language. The research highlights generative AI’s influence in shaping heritage narratives and the challenges of ensuring unbiased and multi-vocal outputs. This study advances the fields of cultural heritage, digital humanities, and education, while also shedding light on the wider implications of ChatGPT’s outputs for memory politics and democratic governance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1508-1530
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Heritage Studies
Volume31
Issue number11
Early online date29 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • ChatGPT
  • generative AI
  • Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA)
  • memoryscapes
  • political bias
  • contested heritage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ChatGPT’s interpretation of contested memoryscapes favours the voice of current governments, capitalism and the far-right'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this