Child maltreatment and health service use: Findings of the Australian Child Maltreatment Study

Rosana Pacella, Alexandra Nation, Ben Mathews, James G. Scott, Daryl J. Higgins, Divna M. Haslam*, Michael P. Dunne, David Finkelhor, Franziska Meinck, Holly E. Erskine, Hannah J. Thomas, Eva Malacova, David M. Lawrence, Claire Monks

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives
To examine associations between child maltreatment and health service use, both overall, by type and by the number of types of maltreatment reported.

Design, setting
Cross-sectional, retrospective survey using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire-R2: Adapted Version (Australian Child Maltreatment Study); computer-assisted mobile telephone interviews using random digit dialling, Australia, 9 April – 11 October 2021.

Participants
Australians aged 16 years or more. The target sample size was 8500 respondents: 3500 people aged 16–24 years and 1000 respondents each from the five age groups (25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65 years or more).

Main outcome measures
Self-reported health service use during the past twelve months: hospital admissions, length of stay, and reasons for admission; and numbers of consultations with health care professionals, overall and by type. Associations between maltreatment and health service use are reported as odds ratios adjusted for age group, gender, socio-economic status, financial hardship (childhood and current), and geographic remoteness.

Results
A total of 8503 participants completed the survey. Respondents who had experienced child maltreatment were significantly more likely than those who had not to report a hospital admission during the preceding twelve months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–1.66), particularly admission with a mental disorder (aOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.03–5.6). The likelihood of six or more visits to general practitioners (aOR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.87–3.02) or of a consultation with a mental health nurse (aOR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.75–4.06), psychologist (aOR, 2.40; 95% CI, 2.00–2.88), or psychiatrist (aOR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.25–4.04) were each higher for people who reported maltreatment during childhood. People who reported three or more maltreatment types were generally most likely to report greater health service use.

Conclusions
Child maltreatment has a major impact on health service use. Early, targeted interventions are vital, not only for supporting children directly, but also for their longer term wellbeing and reducing their health system use throughout life.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S40-S46
Number of pages7
JournalThe Medical journal of Australia
Volume218
Issue numberS6
Early online date2 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • child welfare
  • community health services
  • cost of illness
  • health services

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Child maltreatment and health service use: Findings of the Australian Child Maltreatment Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this