Children’s wellbeing has moved from an academic field of interest to a policy and practice framework, internationally and in many countries. Children’s wellbeing tends to be twinned casually with children’s rights but recent Scottish legislation – the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 – has put children’s rights and children’s wellbeing in tension. This provides an opportunity to consider the concepts critically. The article scrutinises parliamentary debates and accompanying submissions, to reveal that children’s rights arguments failed due to political concerns about litigation and a lack of evidence that children’s rights improved children’s lives. Children’s wellbeing arguments were more successful, as children’s wellbeing continues the familiar trajectory of a needs-based approach. It has additional benefits of maximising outcomes, emphasising early intervention and prevention, and statistical development. It also risks being apolitical and professionally-driven, with no minimum standards and limited recourse for children’s and their families’ rights and complaints. These findings raise broader questions about how to argue for children’s rights in national and global contexts where children’s wellbeing has ever-increasing prominence, fuelled by calls for evidence-based policy and accountability via outcomes.
|Number of pages||20|
|Journal||International Journal of Children’s Rights|
|Early online date||21 Dec 2015|
|Publication status||Published - 2015|
- children’s rights
- children’s wellbeing
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Children’s wellbeing and children’s rights in tension?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- Global Justice Academy
- Moray House School of Education and Sport - Chair of Childhood Policy
- Institute for Education, Community & Society
Person: Academic: Research Active