Child's play: Temporal discourse, counterpower, and environmental politics

Andrew Hom, Brent J. Steele

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

This chapter examines debates related to environmental equity and capacity as instantiations of discursive temporality in international politics. Temporal discourse, in this case a Western modern version of unilinear development, serves as a sophisticated Othering device that underpins the historical association of civilization and industrialization with “progress”. However compelling, this temporal discourse cannot entirely prevent challenges to the hegemony it helps construct, as exemplified by the discursive manoeuvres of developing countries on environmental issues. Countries that were previously treated as “children” due to their low levels of development appropriate the metaphor for their own purposes in a resistance we title “counterpower”. They do so by arguing that their lower development excuses them from adhering to stringent environmental standards meant to curb the excesses of wealthy, developed, “adult” nations. We conclude by reflecting on the intriguing points that counter-hegemonic temporalized discourse poses for emerging work on time and international politics.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTime, Temporality and Violence in International Relations
Subtitle of host publication(De)fatalizing the Present, Forging Radical Alternatives
EditorsAnna M. Agathangelou, Kyle D. Killian
Place of PublicationAbingdon
PublisherRoutledge
Pages189-204
ISBN (Electronic)9781315883700
ISBN (Print)9780415712712
Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2016

Publication series

NameInterventions
PublisherRoutledge

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • time
  • temporality
  • counterpower
  • environment
  • international politics
  • discourse
  • United Nations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Child's play: Temporal discourse, counterpower, and environmental politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this