TY - JOUR
T1 - Classifying organisms and artefacts by their outline shapes
AU - Salili-James, Arianna
AU - MacKay, Anne
AU - Rodriguez-Alvarez, Emilio
AU - Rodriguez-Perez, Diana
AU - Mannack, Thomas
AU - Rawlings, Timothy A.
AU - Palmer, A. Richard
AU - Todd, Jonathan
AU - Riutta, Terhi E.
AU - MacInnis-Ng, Cate
AU - Han, Zhitong
AU - Davies, Megan
AU - Thorpe, Zinnia
AU - Marsland, Stephen
AU - Leroi, Armand M.
N1 - Funding Information:
A.S.-J. was supported by an EPSRC studentship, awarded to Brunel University London. Acknowledgements
PY - 2022/10/12
Y1 - 2022/10/12
N2 - We often wish to classify objects by their shapes. Indeed, the study of shapes is an important part of many scientific fields, such as evolutionary biology, structural biology, image processing and archaeology. However, mathematical shape spaces are rather complicated and nonlinear. The most widely used methods of shape analysis, geometric morphometrics, treat the shapes as sets of points. Diffeomorphic methods consider the underlying curve rather than points, but have rarely been applied to real-world problems. Using a machine classifier, we tested the ability of several of these methods to describe and classify the shapes of a variety of organic and man-made objects. We find that one method, based on square-root velocity functions (SRVFs), outperforms all others, including a standard geometric morphometric method (eigenshapes), and that it is also superior to human experts using shape alone. When the SRVF approach is constrained to take account of homologous landmarks it can accurately classify objects of very different shapes. The SRVF method identifies a shortest path between shapes, and we show that this can be used to estimate the shapes of intermediate steps in evolutionary series. Diffeomorphic shape analysis methods, we conclude, now provide practical and effective solutions to many shape description and classification problems in the natural and human sciences.
AB - We often wish to classify objects by their shapes. Indeed, the study of shapes is an important part of many scientific fields, such as evolutionary biology, structural biology, image processing and archaeology. However, mathematical shape spaces are rather complicated and nonlinear. The most widely used methods of shape analysis, geometric morphometrics, treat the shapes as sets of points. Diffeomorphic methods consider the underlying curve rather than points, but have rarely been applied to real-world problems. Using a machine classifier, we tested the ability of several of these methods to describe and classify the shapes of a variety of organic and man-made objects. We find that one method, based on square-root velocity functions (SRVFs), outperforms all others, including a standard geometric morphometric method (eigenshapes), and that it is also superior to human experts using shape alone. When the SRVF approach is constrained to take account of homologous landmarks it can accurately classify objects of very different shapes. The SRVF method identifies a shortest path between shapes, and we show that this can be used to estimate the shapes of intermediate steps in evolutionary series. Diffeomorphic shape analysis methods, we conclude, now provide practical and effective solutions to many shape description and classification problems in the natural and human sciences.
KW - archaeology
KW - biology
KW - classification
KW - diffeomorphisms
KW - shape analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85140470553
U2 - 10.1098/rsif.2022.0493
DO - 10.1098/rsif.2022.0493
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140470553
SN - 1742-5689
VL - 19
JO - Journal of The Royal Society Interface
JF - Journal of The Royal Society Interface
IS - 195
M1 - 20220493
ER -