TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinically relevant fatigue in men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer on long-term androgen deprivation therapy
AU - Storey, D.J.
AU - McLaren, D.B.
AU - Atkinson, M A
AU - Butcher, I.
AU - Frew, L.C.
AU - Smyth, J.F.
AU - Sharpe, M.
PY - 2011/11/1
Y1 - 2011/11/1
N2 - Background: The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence and associations of clinically relevant fatigue (CRF) in men with biochemically controlled prostate cancer on long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Patients and Methods: One hundred and ninety-eight men were surveyed and the prevalence of CRF (Brief Fatigue Inventory score > 3) determined. Associations with other measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; International Prostate Symptom Score; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire; Brief Pain Inventory worst pain; clinical and demographic information) were explored in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Eight-one per cent (160 of 198) of questionnaires were analysable. CRF prevalence was 43% (68 of 160). CRF associations included moderate/severe urinary symptoms, anxiety and medical co-morbidities; the strongest associations were depression [odds ratio (OR) 9.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-22.8] and pain (OR 9.2, 95% CI 4.0-21.5). After controlling for other factors, the independent associations were depression (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.6-14.0) and pain (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.0-8.9). There was no association with age, disease burden or treatment duration. Conclusions: Two-fifths of men with biochemically controlled prostate cancer on long-term ADT report CRF that interferes with function. Management aimed at improving CRF should address depression and pain.
AB - Background: The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence and associations of clinically relevant fatigue (CRF) in men with biochemically controlled prostate cancer on long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Patients and Methods: One hundred and ninety-eight men were surveyed and the prevalence of CRF (Brief Fatigue Inventory score > 3) determined. Associations with other measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; International Prostate Symptom Score; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire; Brief Pain Inventory worst pain; clinical and demographic information) were explored in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Eight-one per cent (160 of 198) of questionnaires were analysable. CRF prevalence was 43% (68 of 160). CRF associations included moderate/severe urinary symptoms, anxiety and medical co-morbidities; the strongest associations were depression [odds ratio (OR) 9.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-22.8] and pain (OR 9.2, 95% CI 4.0-21.5). After controlling for other factors, the independent associations were depression (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.6-14.0) and pain (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.0-8.9). There was no association with age, disease burden or treatment duration. Conclusions: Two-fifths of men with biochemically controlled prostate cancer on long-term ADT report CRF that interferes with function. Management aimed at improving CRF should address depression and pain.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-84860991065&md5=9cbc36b82350e32cac5831f479f4942a
U2 - 10.1590/S1677-55382011000600029
DO - 10.1590/S1677-55382011000600029
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84860991065
VL - 37
SP - 798
JO - International Braz J Urol
JF - International Braz J Urol
SN - 1677-5538
IS - 6
ER -