Abstract
Taking the recent UN Report about extreme poverty in the UK as a point of departure, this article analyses and assesses William Cavanaugh’s political ecclesiology. Drawing on the interpretation of Martin Luther’s concept of creation by Scandinavian Creation Theology, I argue that creation destabilises the distinction Cavanaugh draws between what he considers to be church and what he considers not to be church. I account for creation as a web of vulnerability in which all creatures are vulnerable to both creature and creator. In contrast to Cavanaugh’s strong and stable church, I advocate for what I call “coalitional church”: a church that can enter into coalitions with Christians and non-Christians in order to call for conditions under which vulnerable life is liveable. The public and political task of churches is not necessarily to fight the state, but to hold the state accountable to its citizens, whether they are Christian or non-Christian.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 154-178 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology |
Volume | 73 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 18 Sep 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2019 |
Keywords
- church
- state
- Scandinavian creation theology
- doctrine of the two kingdoms
- William Cavanaugh
- Martin Luther
- Nikolaj F. S. Grundtvig
- political theology