Common lizards break Dollo’s law of irreversibility: Genome-wide phylogenomics support a single origin of viviparity and re-evolution of oviparity

Hans Recknagel, Nicholas A. Kamenos, Kathryn R. Elmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Dollo’s law of irreversibility states that once a complex trait has been lost in evolution, it cannot be regained. It is thought that complex epistatic interactions and developmental constraints impede the re-emergence of such a trait. Oviparous reproduction (egg-laying) requires the formation of an eggshell and represents an example of such a complex trait. In reptiles, viviparity (live-bearing) has evolved repeatedly but it is highly disputed if oviparity can re-evolve. Here, using up to 194,358 SNP loci and 1,334,760 bp of sequence, we reconstruct the phylogeny of viviparous and oviparous lineages of common lizards and infer the evolutionary history of parity modes. Our phylogeny supports six main common lizard lineages that have been previously identified. We find strong statistical support for a topological arrangement that suggests a reversal to oviparity from viviparity. Our topology is consistent with highly differentiated chromosomal configurations between lineages, but disagrees with previous phylogenetic studies in some nodes. While we find high support for a reversal to oviparity, more genomic and developmental data are needed to robustly test this and assess the mechanism by which a reversal might have occurred.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)579-588
Number of pages10
JournalMolecular phylogenetics and evolution
Volume127
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 May 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • biogeography
  • Dollo’s law
  • lacertidae
  • molecular systematics
  • squamata
  • transition
  • viviparity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Common lizards break Dollo’s law of irreversibility: Genome-wide phylogenomics support a single origin of viviparity and re-evolution of oviparity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this