TY - JOUR
T1 - COMPARING MASS MAPPING RECONSTRUCTION METHODS WITH MINKOWSKI FUNCTIONALS
AU - Grewal, Nisha
AU - Zuntz, Joe
AU - Tröster, Tilman
N1 - Acceptance date unknown - proxy used.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, National University of Ireland Maynooth. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/6/24
Y1 - 2024/6/24
N2 - Using higher-order statistics to capture cosmological information from weak lensing surveys often requires a transformation of observed shear to a measurement of the convergence signal. This inverse problem is complicated by noise and boundary effects, and various reconstruction methods have been developed to implement the process. Here we evaluate the retention of signal information of four such methods: Kaiser-Squires, Wiener filter, DarkMappy, and DeepMass. We use the higher order statistics Minkowski functionals to determine which method best reconstructs the original convergence with efficiency and precision. We find DeepMass produces the tightest constraints on cosmological parameters, while Kaiser-Squires, Wiener filter, and DarkMappy are similar at a smoothing scale of 3.5 arcmin. We also study the MF inaccuracy caused by inappropriate training sets in the DeepMass method and find it to be large compared to the errors, underlining the importance of selecting appropriate training cosmologies.
AB - Using higher-order statistics to capture cosmological information from weak lensing surveys often requires a transformation of observed shear to a measurement of the convergence signal. This inverse problem is complicated by noise and boundary effects, and various reconstruction methods have been developed to implement the process. Here we evaluate the retention of signal information of four such methods: Kaiser-Squires, Wiener filter, DarkMappy, and DeepMass. We use the higher order statistics Minkowski functionals to determine which method best reconstructs the original convergence with efficiency and precision. We find DeepMass produces the tightest constraints on cosmological parameters, while Kaiser-Squires, Wiener filter, and DarkMappy are similar at a smoothing scale of 3.5 arcmin. We also study the MF inaccuracy caused by inappropriate training sets in the DeepMass method and find it to be large compared to the errors, underlining the importance of selecting appropriate training cosmologies.
KW - cosmology
KW - gravitational lensing
KW - mass reconstruction
KW - Minkowski Functionals
KW - mass mapping
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197215840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.33232/001c.120394
DO - 10.33232/001c.120394
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85197215840
SN - 2565-6120
VL - 7
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - Open Journal of Astrophysics
JF - Open Journal of Astrophysics
ER -