@article{d2cd561cb845483481ec5b3589046ce6,
title = "Comparison of ultra-low, low and high concentration local anaesthetic for labour epidural analgesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis",
keywords = "Bayesian, epidural, labour analgesia, local anaesthetic, maternal outcomes, meta-analysis, obstetric outcomes",
author = "L. Halliday and M. Kinsella and M. Shaw and J. Cheyne and Nelson, {S. M.} and Kearns, {R. J.}",
note = "Funding Information: The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020210878). RK was supported via grant funding from the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association and the Scottish Society of Anaesthetists and by an NHS Research Scotland Career Researcher Fellowship. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the UK National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research, or the UK Department of Health and Social Care or any other funders mentioned here. SN has participated in Advisory Boards and received consultancy or speakers' fees from Access Fertility, Beckman Coulter, Ferring, Finox, Merck, Modern Fertility, MSD, Roche Diagnostics and The Fertility Partnership. No other competing interests declared. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.",
year = "2022",
month = may,
day = "24",
doi = "10.1111/anae.15756",
language = "English",
journal = "Anaesthesia: Peri-operative medicine, critical care and pain",
issn = "0003-2409",
publisher = "Wiley",
}