Compensating for processing difficulty in discourse: Effect of parallelism in contrastive relations

Ludivine Crible, Martin Pickering

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This study aims to establish whether the processing of different connectives (and, but) and different coherence relations (addition, contrast) can be modulated by a structural feature of the connected segments, namely parallelism. While but is mainly used to contrast two expressions, and occurs in many different relations and has been shown to come with a processing cost. We report three self-paced reading experiments in which we manipulate whether the connected segments share a common verb phrase. Such parallel constructions frequently occur in contrastive relations, although they are typically treated as additive in comprehension research. We expect that parallelism will compensate for the cognitive complexity of contrast and for the ambiguity of and, by further signalling the coherence relation. Our results indicate that parallelism speeds up processing, and provide further evidence for priming in comprehension. However, parallelism interacted with connective ambiguity in an overt disambiguation task (Experiment 3), but not in a more natural reading task (Experiment 2). We argue that the processing of contrast remains shallow unless disambiguation is explicitly required.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDiscourse Processes
Early online date20 Oct 2020
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Oct 2020

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • discourse connectives
  • ambiguity
  • parallelism
  • self-paced reading
  • contrastive relations


Dive into the research topics of 'Compensating for processing difficulty in discourse: Effect of parallelism in contrastive relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this