Abstract / Description of output
The legitimacy of embryo research, use, and destruction is among the most important issues facing contemporary bioethics. In the preceding paper, Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu took up an argument of John Harris and tried to find some new ways of avoiding its dramatic consequences. They noted that: “John Harris has argued that if … it is morally permissible to engage in reproduction … despite knowledge that a large number of embryos will fail to implant and quickly die, then … it is morally permissible to produce embryos for other purposes that involve killing them, for instance, to harvest stem cells” and suggest that this argument fails.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 61-74 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 22 Dec 2009 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- NATURAL REPRODUCTION
- DISABILITY
- LESSONS
- LOTTERY