TY - JOUR
T1 - Conservation genomics of an Australian cycad, cycas calcicola and the absence of key genotypes in botanic gardens
AU - Clugston, James A. R.
AU - Ruhsam, Markus
AU - Kernicher, Gregory J.
AU - Henwood, Murray
AU - Milne, Richard I.
AU - Nagalingum, Nathalie
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to acknowledge funding received from the Australian Flora Foundation, the Australasian Systematic Botany Society, and The Nature Conservatory—The Thomas Foundation for an Australian Conservation Taxonomy Award. Support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) UK and the EASTBIO Doctoral Training Partnership studentship at the University of Edinburgh is greatly acknowledged. We wish to thank Lichfield National Park and Charles Darwin University for allowing us to collect samples. Joe Perner of Cycad International for helping us locate population of C. calcicola around the Katherine region. The staff at the Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, in particular, Carolyn Connolly is thanked for her support in the molecular laboratory, Hannah McPherson for helping with the initial quality testing of data. We also thank the California Academy of Sciences; Joe Russack for his support and assistance in data assembly and Athena Lam and Boni Cruz for their support in the molecular laboratory. The assistance of various botanic gardens is acknowledged for providing C. calcicola leaf tissue samples, including Patrick Griffith and Michael Calonje of the Montgomery Botanical Center, Florida, USA and George Brown Darwin Botanic Garden Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia. We wish to thank, Alan Meerow of the United States Department of Agriculture for his support and advice regarding population genetics of cycads. The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh is supported by the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division.
Funding Information:
We wish to acknowledge funding received from the Australian Flora Foundation, the Australasian Systematic Botany Society, and The Nature Conservatory—The Thomas Foundation for an Australian Conservation Taxonomy Award. Support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) UK and the EASTBIO Doctoral Training Partnership studentship at the University of Edinburgh is greatly acknowledged. We wish to thank Lichfield National Park and Charles Darwin University for allowing us to collect samples. Joe Perner of Cycad International for helping us locate population of C. calcicola around the Katherine region. The staff at the Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, in particular, Carolyn Connolly is thanked for her support in the molecular laboratory, Hannah McPherson for helping with the initial quality testing of data. We also thank the California Academy of Sciences; Joe Russack for his support and assistance in data assembly and Athena Lam and Boni Cruz for their support in the molecular laboratory. The assistance of various botanic gardens is acknowledged for providing C. calcicola leaf tissue samples, including Patrick Griffith and Michael Calonje of the Montgomery Botanical Center, Florida, USA and George Brown Darwin Botanic Garden Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia. We wish to thank, Alan Meerow of the United States Department of Agriculture for his support and advice regarding population genetics of cycads. The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh is supported by the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2022/1/19
Y1 - 2022/1/19
N2 - Understanding the genetic diversity of wild populations is fundamental to conserving species in-situ and ex-situ. To aid conservation plans and to inform ex-situ conservation, we examined the genetic diversity of the cycad Cycas calcicola (Cycadaceae). Samples were collected from wild populations in the Litchfield National Park and Katherine regions in the Northern Territory, Australia. Additional samples were obtained from botanic garden plants that were originally collected in the Katherine region, Daly River and Spirit Hills in the Northern Territory, Australia. Using RADseq we recovered 2271 informative genome-wide SNPs, revealing low to moderate levels of gene diversity (uH
e = 0.037 to 0.135), very low levels of gene flow, and significant levels of inbreeding (mean F
IS = 0.491). Population structure and multivariate analysis showed that populations fall into two genetic groups (Katherine vs Litchfield + Daly River + Spirit Hills). Genetic differentiation was twice as high between populations of the Katherine and Litchfield regions (F
ST ~ 0.1) compared to within these two regions (F
ST ~ 0.05). Increasing population fragmentation together with high levels of inbreeding and very little gene flow are concerning for the future adaptability of this species. The results indicated that the ex-situ collections (1) had significantly lower genetic diversity than the wild populations, and (2) only partly capture the genetic diversity present, particularly because the Litchfield National Park populations are not represented. We recommend that ex-situ collections be expanded to incorporate the genetic diversity found in Litchfield National Park and to increase the number of representatives from Daly River/Spirit Hills, and that in-situ populations from the Katherine and Greater Litchfield regions be conserved as separate management units.
AB - Understanding the genetic diversity of wild populations is fundamental to conserving species in-situ and ex-situ. To aid conservation plans and to inform ex-situ conservation, we examined the genetic diversity of the cycad Cycas calcicola (Cycadaceae). Samples were collected from wild populations in the Litchfield National Park and Katherine regions in the Northern Territory, Australia. Additional samples were obtained from botanic garden plants that were originally collected in the Katherine region, Daly River and Spirit Hills in the Northern Territory, Australia. Using RADseq we recovered 2271 informative genome-wide SNPs, revealing low to moderate levels of gene diversity (uH
e = 0.037 to 0.135), very low levels of gene flow, and significant levels of inbreeding (mean F
IS = 0.491). Population structure and multivariate analysis showed that populations fall into two genetic groups (Katherine vs Litchfield + Daly River + Spirit Hills). Genetic differentiation was twice as high between populations of the Katherine and Litchfield regions (F
ST ~ 0.1) compared to within these two regions (F
ST ~ 0.05). Increasing population fragmentation together with high levels of inbreeding and very little gene flow are concerning for the future adaptability of this species. The results indicated that the ex-situ collections (1) had significantly lower genetic diversity than the wild populations, and (2) only partly capture the genetic diversity present, particularly because the Litchfield National Park populations are not represented. We recommend that ex-situ collections be expanded to incorporate the genetic diversity found in Litchfield National Park and to increase the number of representatives from Daly River/Spirit Hills, and that in-situ populations from the Katherine and Greater Litchfield regions be conserved as separate management units.
KW - RADseq
KW - next generation sequencing
KW - population genetics
KW - genomics
KW - cycadaceae
KW - cyas
KW - ex-situ conservation
KW - in-situ conservation
U2 - 10.1007/s10592-022-01428-8
DO - 10.1007/s10592-022-01428-8
M3 - Article
SN - 1566-0621
VL - 23
SP - 449
EP - 465
JO - Conservation genetics
JF - Conservation genetics
IS - 3
ER -