Conservatism and women's political representation

Karen Celis, Sarah Childs

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Conservative political actors appear rather troubling for many gender and politics scholars and feminist activists. What should we make of their claims to represent women? How should we best understand their actions? This article, based on a critical rereading of the empirical literature and informed by contemporary representation theory, develops a new conceptual framework for assessing the quality of women's substantive representation by conservatives. We find that under specified conditions, conservative representatives do further women's substantive representation. A first set of conditions relates to conservative claims to represent women. These are considered to be for women when they marry conservative women's concerns in society; when conservative representatives act and do not simply engage in rhetoric; and when their actions are not undercut by other acts, policies, or outcomes unfavorable to women. A second set of criteria considers the quality of the process of women's substantive representation. We contend that a feminist process of deliberation about women's interests can include conservative claims as long as they meet the requirements of responsiveness, inclusiveness, and egalitarianism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-26
Number of pages22
JournalPolitics and Gender
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 10 Apr 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'Conservatism and women's political representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this