Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence

Emma L. Davis*, Tim C.D. Lucas, Anna Borlase, Timothy M. Pollington, Sam Abbott, Diepreye Ayabina, Thomas Crellen, Joel Hellewell, CMMID COVID-19 Working Group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that contact tracing has had limited success in the UK in reducing the R number across the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigate potential pitfalls and areas for improvement by extending an existing branching process contact tracing model, adding diagnostic testing and refining parameter estimates. Our results demonstrate that reporting and adherence are the most important predictors of programme impact but tracing coverage and speed plus diagnostic sensitivity also play an important role. We conclude that well-implemented contact tracing could bring small but potentially important benefits to controlling and preventing outbreaks, providing up to a 15% reduction in R. We reaffirm that contact tracing is not currently appropriate as the sole control measure.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5412
JournalNature Communications
Volume12
Issue number1
Early online date13 Sep 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Sep 2021

Keywords

  • computational models
  • epidemiology
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • viral infection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this