Abstract
A 2x2 enhanced Wizard-of-Oz experiment (N = 32) was conducted to compare two different approaches to presenting information to drivers in easy and difficult driving conditions. Data of driving safety, evaluation of the spoken dialogue system, and perception of self were analyzed. Results show that the user-modeled summarizeand-refine (UMSR) approach led to more efficient information retrieval than did the summarize-and-refine (SR) approach. However, depending on driving condition, higher efficiency did not always translate into pleasant subjective experience. Implications for usability testing and interface design were presented, followed by discussions of future research directions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI) 2007 |
| Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
| Pages | 1343-1346 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-59593-593-9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Context and Usability Testing: User-Modeled Information Presentation in Easy and Difficult Driving Conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver