Correction by construction: Dealing with drafting errors by way of interpretation

Lorna Richardson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

In Monsolar IQ Ltd v Woden Park Ltd1 the Court of Appeal corrected a drafting error in a rent review provision of a lease as part of the interpretive exercise. No claim for rectification of the clause had been made. The Court of Appeal noted that the courts have long been able to disregard the literal meaning of a provision were it is clear (1) that an error has been made; and (2) what the contractual provision should have said. The Court of Appeal was of the view that recent Supreme Court decisions on interpretation had not altered that position.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)90-94
Number of pages5
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction by construction: Dealing with drafting errors by way of interpretation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this