The authors regret that in the results section, on page 110, the text refers to Fig. 6d, which is missing in the article. Fig. 6d should be placed below Fig. 6c, on page 111 and should show the trajectory of livestock emissions for Brazil as a whole. Fig. 6d results can be obtained from Fig. 6a–c, i.e., by summing the Cerrado, Amazon and Atlantic Forest emissions. Furthermore, on page 110, there is a reference to Fig. 2e, which should read as Fig. 6d or simply be ignored. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.