TY - JOUR
T1 - Counter countermathematical explanations
AU - Kasirzadeh, Atoosa
N1 - I am grateful to Jim Brown, Franz Huber, Mario Günther, Alan Hájek, Mike Miller, Michael Strevens, and two anonymous referees for Erkenntnis for critical comments and feedback on earlier drafts of this paper. I also thank Koji Tanaka, Alan Baker, audiences at the Workshop on Metaphysical Explanation in Science in Birmingham, participants in the workshop on Non-Causal Explanations: Logical, Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives in Ghent, and audiences at the American Philosophical Association Eastern Division for valuable discussions and suggestions.
PY - 2021/11/8
Y1 - 2021/11/8
N2 - Recently, there have been several attempts to generalize the counterfactual theory of causal explanations to mathematical explanations. The central idea of these attempts is to use conditionals whose antecedents express a mathematical impossibility. Such countermathematical conditionals are plugged into the explanatory scheme of the counterfactual theory and—so is the hope—capture mathematical explanations. Here, I dash the hope that countermathematical explanations simply parallel counterfactual explanations. In particular, I show that explanations based on countermathematicals are susceptible to three problems counterfactual explanations do not face. These problems seriously challenge the prospects for a counterfactual theory of explanation that is meant to cover mathematical explanations. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
AB - Recently, there have been several attempts to generalize the counterfactual theory of causal explanations to mathematical explanations. The central idea of these attempts is to use conditionals whose antecedents express a mathematical impossibility. Such countermathematical conditionals are plugged into the explanatory scheme of the counterfactual theory and—so is the hope—capture mathematical explanations. Here, I dash the hope that countermathematical explanations simply parallel counterfactual explanations. In particular, I show that explanations based on countermathematicals are susceptible to three problems counterfactual explanations do not face. These problems seriously challenge the prospects for a counterfactual theory of explanation that is meant to cover mathematical explanations. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
U2 - 10.1007/s10670-021-00466-x
DO - 10.1007/s10670-021-00466-x
M3 - Article
SN - 0165-0106
JO - Erkenntnis
JF - Erkenntnis
ER -