TY - JOUR
T1 - COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (VIP)
T2 - a multicentre, prospective, case-control study
AU - VIP study investigators
AU - Alexander, James L
AU - Kennedy, Nicholas A
AU - Ibraheim, Hajir
AU - Anandabaskaran, Sulak
AU - Saifuddin, Aamir
AU - Castro Seoane, Rocio
AU - Liu, Zhigang
AU - Nice, Rachel
AU - Bewshea, Claire
AU - D'Mello, Andrea
AU - Constable, Laura
AU - Jones, Gareth R
AU - Balarajah, Sharmili
AU - Fiorentino, Francesca
AU - Sebastian, Shaji
AU - Irving, Peter M
AU - Hicks, Lucy C
AU - Williams, Horace R T
AU - Kent, Alexandra J
AU - Linger, Rachel
AU - Parkes, Miles
AU - Kok, Klaartje
AU - Patel, Kamal V
AU - Teare, Julian P
AU - Altmann, Daniel M
AU - Boyton, Rosemary J
AU - Goodhand, James R
AU - Hart, Ailsa L
AU - Lees, Charlie W
AU - Ahmad, Tariq
AU - Powell, Nick
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support for the VIP study was provided as a research grant by Pfizer. This research was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centres in Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Cambridge (BRC-1215–20014) and the NIHR Clinical Research Facility Cambridge. Recruitment to this study was supported by the NIHR IBD BioResource. The NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility that supported this project is a partnership between the University of Exeter Medical School College of Medicine and Health and Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed in this Article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. JLA is a recipient of a NIHR Academic Clinical Lectureship (CL-2019–21–502), funded by Imperial College London and The Joyce and Norman Freed Charitable Trust. GRJ is supported by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship (220725/Z/20/Z). RJB and DMA are supported by UK Research and Innovation (MR/S019553/1, MR/R02622X/1, MR/V036939/1, and MR/W020610/1), the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre Institute of Translational Medicine & Therapeutics, the Cystic Fibrosis Trust Strategic Research Centre (2019SRC015), NIHR Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Fast Track (NIHR134607), NIHR Long Covid (COV-LT2–0027), Innovate UK (SBRI 10008614), and Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network European Training Network (number 860325).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/4/1
Y1 - 2022/4/1
N2 - Background: The effects that therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have on immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are not yet fully known. Therefore, we sought to determine whether COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses were altered in patients with IBD on commonly used immunosuppressive drugs. Methods: In this multicentre, prospective, case-control study (VIP), we recruited adults with IBD treated with one of six different immunosuppressive treatment regimens (thiopurines, infliximab, a thiopurine plus infliximab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib) and healthy control participants from nine centres in the UK. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccines (either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [Oxford–AstraZeneca], BNT162b2 [Pfizer–BioNTech], or mRNA1273 [Moderna]) 6–12 weeks apart (according to scheduling adopted in the UK). We measured antibody responses 53–92 days after a second vaccine dose using the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations in participants without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, adjusted by age and vaccine type, and was analysed by use of multivariable linear regression models. This study is registered in the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN13495664, and is ongoing. Findings: Between May 31 and Nov 24, 2021, we recruited 483 participants, including patients with IBD being treated with thiopurines (n=78), infliximab (n=63), a thiopurine plus infliximab (n=72), ustekinumab (n=57), vedolizumab (n=62), or tofacitinib (n=30), and 121 healthy controls. We included 370 participants without evidence of previous infection in our primary analysis. Geometric mean anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were significantly lower in patients treated with infliximab (156·8 U/mL [geometric SD 5·7]; p<0·0001), infliximab plus thiopurine (111·1 U/mL [5·7]; p<0·0001), or tofacitinib (429·5 U/mL [3·1]; p=0·0012) compared with controls (1578·3 U/mL [3·7]). There were no significant differences in antibody concentrations between patients treated with thiopurine monotherapy (1019·8 U/mL [4·3]; p=0·74), ustekinumab (582·4 U/mL [4·6]; p=0·11), or vedolizumab (954·0 U/mL [4·1]; p=0·50) and healthy controls. In multivariable modelling, lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were independently associated with infliximab (geometric mean ratio 0·12, 95% CI 0·08–0·17; p<0·0001) and tofacitinib (0·43, 0·23–0·81; p=0·0095), but not with ustekinumab (0·69, 0·41–1·19; p=0·18), thiopurines (0·89, 0·64–1·24; p=0·50), or vedolizumab (1·16, 0·74–1·83; p=0·51). mRNA vaccines (3·68, 2·80–4·84; p<0·0001; vs adenovirus vector vaccines) were independently associated with higher antibody concentrations and older age per decade (0·79, 0·72–0·87; p<0·0001) with lower antibody concentrations. Interpretation: For patients with IBD, the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines varies according to immunosuppressive drug exposure, and is attenuated in recipients of infliximab, infliximab plus thiopurines, and tofacitinib. Scheduling of third primary, or booster, doses could be personalised on the basis of an individual's treatment, and patients taking anti-tumour necrosis factor and tofacitinib should be prioritised. Funding: Pfizer.
AB - Background: The effects that therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have on immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are not yet fully known. Therefore, we sought to determine whether COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses were altered in patients with IBD on commonly used immunosuppressive drugs. Methods: In this multicentre, prospective, case-control study (VIP), we recruited adults with IBD treated with one of six different immunosuppressive treatment regimens (thiopurines, infliximab, a thiopurine plus infliximab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib) and healthy control participants from nine centres in the UK. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccines (either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [Oxford–AstraZeneca], BNT162b2 [Pfizer–BioNTech], or mRNA1273 [Moderna]) 6–12 weeks apart (according to scheduling adopted in the UK). We measured antibody responses 53–92 days after a second vaccine dose using the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations in participants without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, adjusted by age and vaccine type, and was analysed by use of multivariable linear regression models. This study is registered in the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN13495664, and is ongoing. Findings: Between May 31 and Nov 24, 2021, we recruited 483 participants, including patients with IBD being treated with thiopurines (n=78), infliximab (n=63), a thiopurine plus infliximab (n=72), ustekinumab (n=57), vedolizumab (n=62), or tofacitinib (n=30), and 121 healthy controls. We included 370 participants without evidence of previous infection in our primary analysis. Geometric mean anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were significantly lower in patients treated with infliximab (156·8 U/mL [geometric SD 5·7]; p<0·0001), infliximab plus thiopurine (111·1 U/mL [5·7]; p<0·0001), or tofacitinib (429·5 U/mL [3·1]; p=0·0012) compared with controls (1578·3 U/mL [3·7]). There were no significant differences in antibody concentrations between patients treated with thiopurine monotherapy (1019·8 U/mL [4·3]; p=0·74), ustekinumab (582·4 U/mL [4·6]; p=0·11), or vedolizumab (954·0 U/mL [4·1]; p=0·50) and healthy controls. In multivariable modelling, lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were independently associated with infliximab (geometric mean ratio 0·12, 95% CI 0·08–0·17; p<0·0001) and tofacitinib (0·43, 0·23–0·81; p=0·0095), but not with ustekinumab (0·69, 0·41–1·19; p=0·18), thiopurines (0·89, 0·64–1·24; p=0·50), or vedolizumab (1·16, 0·74–1·83; p=0·51). mRNA vaccines (3·68, 2·80–4·84; p<0·0001; vs adenovirus vector vaccines) were independently associated with higher antibody concentrations and older age per decade (0·79, 0·72–0·87; p<0·0001) with lower antibody concentrations. Interpretation: For patients with IBD, the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines varies according to immunosuppressive drug exposure, and is attenuated in recipients of infliximab, infliximab plus thiopurines, and tofacitinib. Scheduling of third primary, or booster, doses could be personalised on the basis of an individual's treatment, and patients taking anti-tumour necrosis factor and tofacitinib should be prioritised. Funding: Pfizer.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Antibody Formation
KW - BNT162 Vaccine
KW - COVID-19 Vaccines
KW - COVID-19/prevention & control
KW - Case-Control Studies
KW - ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
KW - Humans
KW - Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - SARS-CoV-2
U2 - 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00005-X
DO - 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00005-X
M3 - Article
C2 - 35123676
SN - 2468-1253
VL - 7
SP - 342
EP - 352
JO - The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
JF - The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
IS - 4
ER -