Crises and critical junctures in authoritarian regimes: Addressing uprisings’ temporalities and discontinuities

Frederic Volpi, Johannes Gerschewski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

In this article, we aim at sharpening common understandings of the notion of political crisis to better explain the trajectories of authoritarian transformations during popular uprisings. We make three major claims. First, we propose a definition of crisis as brief moments of institutional fluidity and openness in which a process can take different directions. We delineate the crisis concept from the concept of critical junctures and outline how our approach contributes to the methodological debate on ‘near misses’. Second, we indicate how the de-institutionalisation processes leading up to a crisis are to be analytically distinguished from within-crisis moments. We argue in favour of a discontinuity approach that takes into account the different temporalities of gradual lead-up processes and rapid within-crisis dynamics. Finally, we illustrate our theoretical and analytical reasoning with concrete cases from the authoritarian crises of the Arab uprisings, whilst suggesting that our argument can travel to other areas of research in which crisis narratives have gained prominence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1030-1045
Number of pages16
JournalThird World Quarterly
Issue number6
Early online date18 Mar 2020
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • crisis
  • critical juncture
  • de-institutionalisation
  • situational logics
  • near misses
  • authoritarianism
  • Arab uprisings


Dive into the research topics of 'Crises and critical junctures in authoritarian regimes: Addressing uprisings’ temporalities and discontinuities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this