Critical perspectives on AI in education: Political economy, discrimination, commercialization, governance and ethics

Ben Williamson, Rebecca Eynon, Jeremy Knox, Huw C Davies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract / Description of output

AI in education is not only a challenging area of technical development and educational innovation, but increasingly the focus of critical analysis informed by the social sciences, philosophy and theory. This chapter provides an overview of critical perspectives on AI in education (AIED), highlighting the interdisciplinary and multisector historical development of AIED; the political economy of AIED; the emergence of ethical issues of bias and discrimination; the expansion of commercial “edu-businesses” and “Big Tech” companies promising AI solutions in education; the role of AI in educational policy and governance; and the recent emergence of AIED ethics proposals and frameworks. The purpose is to highlight the need for interdisciplinary approaches to AI in education that would involve the expertise of learning scientists, computer scientists and social scientists working together productively and critically to design and assess the results and implications of AIED.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Artificial Intelligence in Education
EditorsBenedict du Boulay, Antonija Mitrovic, Kalina Yacef
Place of PublicationCheltenham, UK
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Chapter25
Pages555-573
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781800375413
ISBN (Print)9781800375406
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Apr 2023

Publication series

NameElgar Handbooks in Education
PublisherEdward Elgar

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • artificial intelligence
  • commercialization
  • AI ethics
  • governance
  • political economy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Critical perspectives on AI in education: Political economy, discrimination, commercialization, governance and ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this