TY - GEN
T1 - Critical Tools for Machine Learning
T2 - 5th ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT 2022
AU - Klumbyte, Goda
AU - Draude, Claude
AU - Taylor, Alex S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was conducted during a fellowship that was supported by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) stipend within the program IFI Internationale Forschungsaufenthalte f r Informatikerinnen und Informatiker (Doktoranden), 2019-2022 (57515303). We are also grateful to anonymous peer reviewers for their helpful comments and constructive feedback.
PY - 2022/6/20
Y1 - 2022/6/20
N2 - This paper investigates how intersectional critical theoretical concepts from social sciences and humanities research can be worked with in machine learning systems design. It does so by presenting a case study of a series of speculative design workshops, conducted in 2021. These workshops drew on intersectional feminist methodologies to construct interdisciplinary interventions in the design of machine learning systems, towards more inclusive, accountable, and contextualized systems design. The concepts of "situating/situated knowledges", "figuration", "diffraction", and "critical fabulation/speculation"were taken up as theoretical and methodological tools for concept-led design workshops. This paper presents the design framework of the workshops and highlights tensions and possibilities with regards to interdisciplinary machine learning systems design towards more inclusive, contextualized, and accountable systems. It discusses the role that critical theoretical concepts can play in a design process and shows how such concepts can work as methodological tools that nonetheless require an open-ended experimental space to function. It presents insights and discussion points regarding what it means to work with critical intersectional knowledge that is inextricably connected to its historical and socio-political roots, and how this reframes what it might mean to design fair and accountable systems.
AB - This paper investigates how intersectional critical theoretical concepts from social sciences and humanities research can be worked with in machine learning systems design. It does so by presenting a case study of a series of speculative design workshops, conducted in 2021. These workshops drew on intersectional feminist methodologies to construct interdisciplinary interventions in the design of machine learning systems, towards more inclusive, accountable, and contextualized systems design. The concepts of "situating/situated knowledges", "figuration", "diffraction", and "critical fabulation/speculation"were taken up as theoretical and methodological tools for concept-led design workshops. This paper presents the design framework of the workshops and highlights tensions and possibilities with regards to interdisciplinary machine learning systems design towards more inclusive, contextualized, and accountable systems. It discusses the role that critical theoretical concepts can play in a design process and shows how such concepts can work as methodological tools that nonetheless require an open-ended experimental space to function. It presents insights and discussion points regarding what it means to work with critical intersectional knowledge that is inextricably connected to its historical and socio-political roots, and how this reframes what it might mean to design fair and accountable systems.
KW - Experimental practice
KW - Feminist epistemologies
KW - Interdisciplinary methodologies
KW - Intersectionality
KW - Machine learning systems design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132997043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3531146.3533207
DO - 10.1145/3531146.3533207
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85132997043
T3 - ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
SP - 1528
EP - 1541
BT - Proceedings of 2022 5th ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT 2022
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
Y2 - 21 June 2022 through 24 June 2022
ER -