Cross-cultural equivalence of parental ratings of child difficulties during the pandemic: Findings from a six-site study

Sarah Foley*, Luca Ronchi*, Serena Lecce, Xin Feng, Meingold H. M. Chan, Claire Hughes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has been shown to be invariant across informants, developmental stage and settings, but tests of cross-cultural equivalence are limited to adolescents’ self-reports. The COVID-19 pandemic makes this gap particularly pertinent, given the need to understand whether distinct government approaches (e.g., school closures) are uniquely associated with variability in children’s psychosocial outcomes and the reliance on parents’ ratings for young children.
Methods: Within a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) framework, we tested the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the SDQ across six countries: Australia, China, Italy, Sweden, the UK and USA, using a sample of 1761 parents of 3- to 8-year-olds (M = 5.76, SD = 1.09).
Results: A five-factors model showed good fit to the data and partial cross-cultural scalar invariance. In this sample, Swedish parents reported the fewest peer problems (Cohen’s d = .950) and the highest prosocial scores (Cohen’s d = .547), whilst British parents reported the greatest child emotional (Cohen’s d = .412) and hyperactivity problems (Cohen’s d = .535).
Conclusions: The present results indicate that the parent-version of the SDQ is appropriate for use and comparison across different contexts during the pandemic.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages38
JournalInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Early online date22 Aug 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Aug 2022

Keywords

  • COVID-19 pandemic
  • child psychopathology
  • cross-cultural
  • measurement invariance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-cultural equivalence of parental ratings of child difficulties during the pandemic: Findings from a six-site study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this