Abstract
Creating effective educational interventions that correct people’s misconceptions is difficult. This has led many researchers to conclude that people do not properly attend tone information in a way that they should. However, even if ascientifically-grounded intervention fails, it is still possible that other interventions would be effective. Yet, it is not practically feasible to systematically explore and test the entire hypothesis space of possible interventions. Here, we examined whether researchers could use online arguments to develop effective educational interventions, in effect, narrowing the intervention hypothesis space. Across two experiments (N = 1,816), we found that arguments crowdsourced from Reddit’s Change My View were as effective or more effective at changing beliefs than interventions developed by academics and published in top-tier scientific journals. These results suggest that researchers can build on successful crowdsourced arguments to develop effective educational interventions likely to co
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society |
Place of Publication | Montreal |
Publisher | Cognitive Science Society |
Pages | 2599-2605 |
ISBN (Print) | 0991196775 |
Publication status | Published - 27 Jul 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society - Palais des Congrès de Montréal, Montréal , Canada Duration: 24 Jul 2019 → 27 Jul 2019 Conference number: 41 https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci-2019/ |
Conference
Conference | 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | COGSCI 2019 |
Country/Territory | Canada |
City | Montréal |
Period | 24/07/19 → 27/07/19 |
Internet address |