Abstract
We study the relation between maps of a high-dimensional stimulus manifold onto an essentially two-dimensional cortical area and low-dimensional maps of stimulus features such as centroid position, orientation, spatial frequency, etc. Whereas the former safely can be represented in a Euclidean space, the latter are shown to require a Riemannian metric in order to reach qualitatively similar stationary structures under a standard learning algorithm. We show that the non-Euclidean framework allows for a tentative explanation of the presence of the so-called “pinwheels” in feature maps and compare maps obtained numerically in the flat high-dimensional maps and in the curved low-dimensional case.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 533 - 539 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Neurocomputing |
Volume | 44–46 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2002 |
Keywords
- Orientation columns