Abstract
The debate over the degree of flexibility at the disposal of national courts in Europe to grant, deny, or tailor, injunctive relief in patent litigation seems to be a never-ending story. In most jurisdictions, absent exceptional circumstances, findings of infringement lead national courts to grant, quasi-automatically, an injunction. However, some scholars as well as industry players, have argued that in light of recent changes in litigation behaviour as well as technology developments, a general principle of proportionality should play a more prominent role vis-à-vis injunctive relief. It is in particular with reference to Art. 3(2) of the Enforcement Directive that such claims have been made.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3-25 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | JIPITEC - Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2020 |