Cutting back patent over-enforcement: How to address abusive practices within the EU enforcement framework

Amandine Leonard, Alain Strowel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The debate over the degree of flexibility at the disposal of national courts in Europe to grant, deny, or tailor, injunctive relief in patent litigation seems to be a never-ending story. In most jurisdictions, absent exceptional circumstances, findings of infringement lead national courts to grant, quasi-automatically, an injunction. However, some scholars as well as industry players, have argued that in light of recent changes in litigation behaviour as well as technology developments, a general principle of proportionality should play a more prominent role vis-à-vis injunctive relief. It is in particular with reference to Art. 3(2) of the Enforcement Directive that such claims have been made.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-25
Number of pages23
JournalJIPITEC - Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law
Volume11
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cutting back patent over-enforcement: How to address abusive practices within the EU enforcement framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this