Abstract / Description of output
In function learning experiments, where participants learn relationships from sequentially-presented examples, people show a strong tacit expectation that most relationships are linear, and struggle to learn and extrapolate from non-linear relationships. In contrast, experiments with similar tasks where data are presented simultaneously – typically using scatter plots – have shown that human learners can discover and extrapolate from complex non-linear trends. Do people have different expectations in these task types, or can the results be attributed to effects of memory and data availability? In a direct comparison of both paradigms, we found that differences between task types can be attributed to data availability. We show that a simple memory-limited Bayesian model is consistent with human extrapolations for linear data for both high and low data availability. However, our model underestimates the participants’ ability to infer non-monotonic functions, especially when data is sparse. This suggest that people track higher-order properties of functions when learning and generalizing.
Keywords: function learning, function estimation, resource rationality
Keywords: function learning, function estimation, resource rationality
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society |
Place of Publication | Madison, United States |
Pages | 2017-2022 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Event | 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society - Madison, United States Duration: 25 Jul 2018 → 28 Jul 2018 http://www.cognitivesciencesociety.org/conference/cogsci-2018/ |
Conference
Conference | 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | CogSci 2018 |
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Madison |
Period | 25/07/18 → 28/07/18 |
Internet address |