Defamation Outside Reputation: Proposals for the Reform of English Law

Eric Descheemaeker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The view that the wrong of defamation protects the interest in reputation, and nothing but that interest, is ordinarily taken for granted in modern English law. It is, however, incorrect. This paper gives four examples of ways in which the English law of defamation has strayed into the protection of other interests, in particular privacy, self-worth and wealth. They are: the supplementary tests of defamatoriness (the ridicule test and the ‘shun and avoid’ test); s. 8(5) of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974; the rule that slanders are not ordinarily actionable without proof of ‘special damage’; and, finally, the compensation of losses consequential upon the injury to reputation. It is argued that these are all unwarranted and ought to be reformed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-139
Number of pages6
JournalTort Law Review
Volume18
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Defamation
  • reputation
  • English law
  • law reform

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defamation Outside Reputation: Proposals for the Reform of English Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this