Degrees of estrangement: The cultural theory of risk and comparative penology

Richard Sparks*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

We can accept that risk is a key idea in understanding contemporary penality-but which constructions of risk are most compelling? Moreover, how does risk-based practice intersect with other structuring principles of penal systems and penal politics? I compare and contrast the views of Feeley and Simon (1992) and of Mary Douglas’s ‘cultural theory’ (Douglas, 1992), and conclude that among the attractions of the latter are its orientation towards comparative empirical inquiry and its understanding of the notion of ‘political culture’. I conclude with some reflections on the comparative penological work in a period marked by both globalizing and particularizing trends.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Institutional Dynamics of Culture, Volumes I and II
Subtitle of host publicationThe New Durkheimians
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter50
Pages417-434
Number of pages18
Volume1-2
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781351887663
ISBN (Print)9781315238975
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Nov 2008

Publication series

NameThe International Library of Essays in Anthropology
PublisherRoutledge

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • comparison
  • culture
  • new penology
  • politics
  • risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Degrees of estrangement: The cultural theory of risk and comparative penology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this