TY - JOUR
T1 - Delivering compassionate NHS healthcare
T2 - A qualitative study exploring the ethical implications of resetting NHS maternity and paediatric services following the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic
AU - Chiumento, Anna
AU - Fovargue, Sara
AU - Redhead, Caroline
AU - Draper, Heather
AU - Frith, Lucy
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from the UKRI AHRC Covid-19 rapid response call (AH/V00820X/1) to the Everyday and Pandemic Ethics project (https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/projects/when-pandemic-and-everyday-ethics-collide-supporting-ethical-deci ) led by Dr Lucy Frith.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - A distinction can be drawn between healthcare, where compassion is evident, and the functional delivery of health services. Measures to curb the spread of COVID-19, such as personal protective equipment, telehealth, and visiting restrictions created barriers to service delivery and put pressure on healthcare. Through 37 qualitative interviews with NHS senior managers (n = 11), health professionals (n = 26), and 5 focus group discussions with members of the public (n = 26), we explored experiences of the everyday ethical tensions created as services were being re-established following the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in England. Our analysis enriches an understanding of compassionate care as outlined in NHS operational documents - covering the emotional, moral, and relational components of healthcare beyond the functionalities of treatment. From this analysis, we consider the normative standards underpinning NHS healthcare, concluding that, wherever possible, offering compassionate healthcare to patients and their families should be facilitated, and health professionals should themselves be compassionately supported in the workplace. Our findings foreground the need to consider the consequences of the short-term adoption of a functional treatment approach, including strategies that support health professionals and inform the public, to avoid the long-term damage caused by the fracturing of compassionate healthcare.
AB - A distinction can be drawn between healthcare, where compassion is evident, and the functional delivery of health services. Measures to curb the spread of COVID-19, such as personal protective equipment, telehealth, and visiting restrictions created barriers to service delivery and put pressure on healthcare. Through 37 qualitative interviews with NHS senior managers (n = 11), health professionals (n = 26), and 5 focus group discussions with members of the public (n = 26), we explored experiences of the everyday ethical tensions created as services were being re-established following the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in England. Our analysis enriches an understanding of compassionate care as outlined in NHS operational documents - covering the emotional, moral, and relational components of healthcare beyond the functionalities of treatment. From this analysis, we consider the normative standards underpinning NHS healthcare, concluding that, wherever possible, offering compassionate healthcare to patients and their families should be facilitated, and health professionals should themselves be compassionately supported in the workplace. Our findings foreground the need to consider the consequences of the short-term adoption of a functional treatment approach, including strategies that support health professionals and inform the public, to avoid the long-term damage caused by the fracturing of compassionate healthcare.
KW - care
KW - compassion
KW - Covid-19
KW - doctors
KW - ethics
KW - maternity
KW - midwifery
KW - NHS healthcare
KW - nursing
KW - paediatrics
KW - patients and public
KW - qualitative
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85184515544
U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116503
DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116503
M3 - Article
C2 - 38324977
AN - SCOPUS:85184515544
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 344
JO - Social Science and Medicine
JF - Social Science and Medicine
M1 - 116503
ER -