TY - JOUR
T1 - Demographic, clinical, and outcome features of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and CRLF2 deregulation
T2 - results from the MRC ALL97 clinical trial
AU - Ensor, Hannah M.
AU - Schwab, Claire
AU - Russell, Lisa J.
AU - Richards, Sue M.
AU - Morrison, Heather
AU - Masic, Dino
AU - Jones, Lisa
AU - Kinsey, Sally E.
AU - Vora, Ajay J.
AU - Mitchell, Christopher D.
AU - Harrison, Christine J.
AU - Moorman, Anthony V.
PY - 2010/11/24
Y1 - 2010/11/24
N2 - Deregulated expression of CRLF2 (CRLF2-d) arises via its juxtaposition to the IGH@ enhancer or
P2RY8 promoter. Among 865 BCP-ALL children treated on MRC ALL97, 52 (6%) has CRLF2-d but it
was more prevalent among Down syndrome patients (54%). P2RY8-CRLF2 (n=43) was more frequent
than IGH@-CRLF2 (n=9). CRLF2-d was not associated with age, sex or white cell count, but IGH@-
CRLF2 patients were older than P2RY8-CRLF2 patients (median 8 v 4 years, p=0.0017). Patients with
CRLF2-d were more likely to present with enlarged livers and spleens (38% v 18%, p<0.001). CRLF2-d
was not seen in conjunction with established chromosomal translocations but 6 (12%) cases had
high hyperdiploidy and 5 (10%) iAMP21. Univariate analysis suggested that CRLF2-d was associated
with an inferior outcome: [EFS HR=2.27 (95% CI 1.48-3.47), p<0.001, OS 3.69 (2.34-5.84), p<0.001].
However, multivariate analysis indicated that its effect was mediated by other risk factors such as
cytogenetics and DS status [EFS 1.45 (0.88-2.39), p=0.140, OS 1.90 (1.08-3.36), p=0.027]. Although
the outcome of IGH@-CRLF2 patients appeared inferior compared to P2RY8-CRLF2 patients the
result was not significant [EFS 2.69 (1.15-6.31), p=0.023; OS 2.86 (1.15-6.79), p=0.021]. Therefore,
we concluded that patients with CRLF2-d should be classified into the intermediate cytogenetic risk
group.
AB - Deregulated expression of CRLF2 (CRLF2-d) arises via its juxtaposition to the IGH@ enhancer or
P2RY8 promoter. Among 865 BCP-ALL children treated on MRC ALL97, 52 (6%) has CRLF2-d but it
was more prevalent among Down syndrome patients (54%). P2RY8-CRLF2 (n=43) was more frequent
than IGH@-CRLF2 (n=9). CRLF2-d was not associated with age, sex or white cell count, but IGH@-
CRLF2 patients were older than P2RY8-CRLF2 patients (median 8 v 4 years, p=0.0017). Patients with
CRLF2-d were more likely to present with enlarged livers and spleens (38% v 18%, p<0.001). CRLF2-d
was not seen in conjunction with established chromosomal translocations but 6 (12%) cases had
high hyperdiploidy and 5 (10%) iAMP21. Univariate analysis suggested that CRLF2-d was associated
with an inferior outcome: [EFS HR=2.27 (95% CI 1.48-3.47), p<0.001, OS 3.69 (2.34-5.84), p<0.001].
However, multivariate analysis indicated that its effect was mediated by other risk factors such as
cytogenetics and DS status [EFS 1.45 (0.88-2.39), p=0.140, OS 1.90 (1.08-3.36), p=0.027]. Although
the outcome of IGH@-CRLF2 patients appeared inferior compared to P2RY8-CRLF2 patients the
result was not significant [EFS 2.69 (1.15-6.31), p=0.023; OS 2.86 (1.15-6.79), p=0.021]. Therefore,
we concluded that patients with CRLF2-d should be classified into the intermediate cytogenetic risk
group.
U2 - 10.1182/blood-2010-07-297135
DO - 10.1182/blood-2010-07-297135
M3 - Article
SN - 0006-4971
VL - 117
SP - 2129
EP - 2136
JO - Blood
JF - Blood
IS - 7
ER -