Abstract / Description of output
We characterise and evaluate the development of an accredited, in-house faculty based teaching recognition scheme aimed at supporting clinicians and academics to achieve Advance HE Fellowship recognition. The scheme takes 6 to 24 months to complete and forms part of an institution-wide scheme. The evaluation covered 44 months collecting data on participation rates across the school, and 21 semi-structured interviews across 16 staff participants. We describe the outcomes measured, alongside key perceived benefits and challenges to support the implementation of similar schemes elsewhere. Across 130 academic staff there was 61% engagement. In interviews, 11 participants characterised benefits in terms of changes to their teaching, such as adopting new strategies for differing class sizes, and highlighted the benefit of accessible and context-specific development opportunities designed specifically for STEMM practitioners and clinicians. Motivations for participating were mainly intrinsic (69%) with the international professional recognition also featuring (61%, n =10). Of the 23 participants who withdrew, the largest subgroup (39%) withdrew because they had left the institution, and 35% withdrew because of a ‘lack of time’, which encompassed a range of issues. We outline recommendations for implementing similar schemes including protected time, accessible development opportunities, and supporting mentors.