Diagnostic accuracy of FeNO and asthma symptoms increased when evaluated with a superior reference standard

Christina Kellerer, Stefan Wagenpfeil, Luke Daines, Rudolf Jörres, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Antonius Schneider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective To determine the impact of changing reference standards (RS), namely spirometry versus whole body plethysmography (WBP), on estimation of the diagnostic accuracy of Fractioned exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) and clinical signs and symptoms (CSS) as index tests regarding asthma diagnosis. Study design and setting Diagnostic study in 393 patients attending a private practice of pneumologists with complaints suspicious of asthma. Firstly, the index tests were compared to the diagnostic results of spirometry in terms of FEV1 responsiveness. Secondly, the index tests were compared to the results of WBP in terms of specific airway resistance and FEV1 responsiveness. Areas under the curve (AUC) were compared with a generalized estimating equation approach based on binary logistic regression. Results FeNO values and CSS ´wheezing´ and ´allergic rhinitis´ showed higher specificities (p<0.001) and sensitivities (not significant) when evaluated with WBP; also Youden-indices increased in these CSS (p<0.05). AUC of FeNO in combination with ´wheezing´ and ´allergic rhinitis´ when WBP was used as RS (AUC=0.724; 95%CI 0.672 to 0.776) was higher compared to spirometry as RS (AUC=0.654; 95%CI 0.585 to 0.722) (p<0.001). Conclusion In case of asthma, superior RS led to more favorable assessment of index tests. FeNO measurement might have been underestimated in some previous studies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Early online date8 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Oct 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic accuracy of FeNO and asthma symptoms increased when evaluated with a superior reference standard'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this