Did a change in Nature journals’ editorial policy for life sciences research improve reporting?

The NPQIP Collaborative group; Malcolm MacLeod; Emily Sena; David W. Howells

doi:10.1136/bmjos-2017-000035

Did a change in Nature journals’ editorial policy for life sciences research improve reporting?

The NPQIP Collaborative group, Malcolm MacLeod (Member of Group Organisation), Emily Sena (Member of Group Organisation), David W. Howells (Member of Group Organisation)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	e000035
Journal	BMJ Open Science
Volume	3
Issue number	1
Early online date	1 Feb 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2017-000035
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 1 Feb 2019

Access to Document

10.1136/bmjos-2017-000035

NPQIP paperFinal published version, 3.8 MBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY)

http://openscience.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjos-2017-000035

Malcolm MacLeod
- Deanery of Clinical Sciences - Personal Chair of Neurology and Translational Neuroscience
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences
- Edinburgh Neuroscience
- Edinburgh Imaging
- Collaborative Approach to Meta Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies
- Cerebrovascular Research Group
Person: Academic: Research Active

Cite this

@article{97c2e0f5f91a467fbf868b8e4e7d73a5,

title = "Did a change in Nature journals{\textquoteright} editorial policy for life sciences research improve reporting?",

author = "{The NPQIP Collaborative group} and Malcolm MacLeod and Emily Sena and Howells, {David W.}",

year = "2019",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1136/bmjos-2017-000035",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

pages = "e000035",

journal = "BMJ Open Science",

issn = "2398-8703",