Differential modes of DNA binding by mismatch uracil DNA glycosylase from Escherichia coli: Implications for abasic lesion processing and enzyme communication in the base excision repair pathway

Seden Grippon, Qiyuan Zhao, Tom Robinson, Jacqueline J.T. Marshall, Rory J. O'Neill, Hugh Manning, Gordon Kennedy, Christopher Dunsby, Mark Neil, Stephen E. Halford, Paul M.W. French, Geoff S. Baldwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Mismatch uracil DNA glycosylase (Mug) from Escherichia coli is an initiating enzyme in the base-excision repair pathway. As with other DNA glycosylases, the abasic product is potentially more harmful than the initial lesion. Since Mug is known to bind its product tightly, inhibiting enzyme turnover, understanding how Mug binds DNA is of significance when considering how Mug interacts with downstream enzymes in the base-excision repair pathway. We have demonstrated differential binding modes of Mug between its substrate and abasic DNA product using both band shift and fluorescence anisotropy assays. Mug binds its product cooperatively, and a stoichiometric analysis of DNA binding, catalytic activity and salt-dependence indicates that dimer formation is of functional significance in both catalytic activity and product binding. This is the first report of cooperativity in the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily of enzymes, and forms the basis of product inhibition in Mug. It therefore provides a new perspective on abasic site protection and the findings are discussed in the context of downstream lesion processing and enzyme communication in the base excision repair pathway.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2593-2603
Number of pages11
JournalNucleic Acids Research
Volume39
Issue number7
Early online date26 Nov 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential modes of DNA binding by mismatch uracil DNA glycosylase from Escherichia coli: Implications for abasic lesion processing and enzyme communication in the base excision repair pathway'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this