Digital methodologies of education governance: Pearson plc and the remediation of methods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article analyses the rise of software systems in education governance, focusing on digital methods in the collection, calculation and circulation of educational data. It examines how software-mediated methods intervene in the ways educational institutions and actors are seen, known and acted upon through an analysis of the methodological complex of Pearson Education’s Learning Curve data-bank and its Center for Digital Data, Analytics and Adaptive Learning. This calls for critical attention to the ‘social life’ of its methods in terms of their historical, technical and methodological provenance; their affordances to generate data for circulation within the institutional circuitry of Pearson and to its wider social networks; their capacity to configure research users’ interpretations; and their generativity to produce the knowledge to influence education policy decisions and pedagogic practices. The purpose of the article is to critically survey the digital methods being mobilized by Pearson to generate educational data, and to examine how its methodological complex acts to produce a new data-based knowledge infrastructure for education. The consequence of this shift to data-based forms of digital education governance by Pearson is a challenge to the legitimacy of the social sciences in the theorization and understanding of learning, and its displacement to the authority of the data sciences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-53
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean Educational Research Journal
Volume15
Issue number1
Early online date23 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • data
  • data science
  • digital methodology
  • Pearson
  • soft goverance
  • software

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Digital methodologies of education governance: Pearson plc and the remediation of methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this